Reader Responses to The Future of AI
Read the storyWe like to hear your thoughts. Click below to send us your feedback.
Send feedbackThis captured my attention as someone who has spent the past year in sustained dialogue with AI. Kebudi’s emphasis on AI as a catalyst for reexamining what “human” intelligence is—its limits, its mechanisms, its blind spots—parallels precisely what I found while writing my book, A Serious Chat with Artificial Intelligence. What struck me was Kebudi’s insistence that AI’s significance lies not in its theatrical predictions of transcendence or doom, but in how it acts as a mirror. In my own conversations with advanced [LLMs], I was reminded that these systems, however dazzling, lack awareness—and yet they can illuminate the mechanistic, pattern-driven aspects of our own thinking. As I argue in the book, “AI teaches us not only what it can do, but what in ourselves is more than a pattern.” Kebudi’s refusal to treat AI as magic aligns with the spirit of inquiry I hope still defines Brown.
Karen McAninch ’74 Providence